MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine Logo
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Standards
    • Types of articles
    • Instructions for authors
    • Editing rules (peer-review protocol)
    • Official Journal’s protocols
  • Editorial Council
  • Peer-review TEAM
  • How to
  • Menu

Author archives

  • About
  • Latest Posts

Andra CARAGHEORGHEOPOL

Latest posts by Andra CARAGHEORGHEOPOL (see all)

  • Screening for Secondary Endocrine Hypertension in Young Patients - July 3, 2015
  • Vitamin D Deficiency in Postmenopausal Women – Biological Correlates - June 18, 2015

Articles signed on MÆDICA, JCM:

Screening for Secondary Endocrine Hypertension in Young Patients

SELECT ISSUE

MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine | Vol. 8 (11), no. 2 2013

CNCSIS - CMR - B+ OBBCSSR

HIGHLIGHTS

What is plagiarism

Plagiarism’s meaning comes from the Latin word ‘plagiarius,’ which means to kidnap. When someone uses the work of another writer or artist without properly citing the source or giving credit, that’s plagiarism. [...]

Committe on Publication Ethics

A forum for responsible and ethical research publishing – Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Members Area


Screening for Secondary Endocrine Hypertension in Young Patients

Raluca TRIFANESCU, Mara CARSOTE, Andra CARAGHEORGHEOPOL, Dan HORTOPAN, Anda DUMITRASCU, Mariana DOBRESCU and Catalina POIANA

ABSTRACT

Background: Secondary endocrine hypertension accounts for 5-12% of hypertension’s causes. In selected patients (type 2 diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea syndrome with resistant hypertension, sudden deterioration in hypertension control), prevalence could be higher. Objectives: To present etiology of endocrine secondary hypertension in a series of patients younger than 40 years at hypertension’s onset. Material and methods: Medical records of 80 patients (39M/41F), aged 30.1 ± 8.2 years (range: 12- 40 years), with maximum systolic blood pressure=190.4 ± 29.2 mm Hg, range: 145-300 mm Hg, maximum diastolic blood pressure=107.7 ± 16.9 mm Hg, range: 80-170 mm Hg) referred by cardiologists for endocrine hypertension screening were retrospectively reviewed. Cardiac and renal causes of secondary hypertension were previously excluded. In all patients, plasma catecholamines were measured by ELISA and plasma cortisol by immunochemiluminescence. Orthostatic aldosterone (ELISA) and direct renin (chemiluminescence) were measured in 48 patients. Results: Secondary endocrine hypertension was confirmed in 16 out of 80 patients (20%). Primary hyperaldosteronism was diagnosed in 7 (4M/3F) out of 48 screened patients (14.6%). i.e. 8.75% from whole group: 5 patients with adrenal tumors (3 left/2 right), 2 patients with bilateral adrenal hyperplasia; all patients were hypokalemic at diagnostic (average nadir K+ levels = 2.5 ± 0.5 mmol/L); four patients were hypokalaemic on diuretic therapy (indapamidum); other 3 patients were hypokalaemic in the absence of diuretic therapy. Cushing’s syndrome was diagnosed in 6 patients (7.5%): subclinical Cushing due to 4 cm right adrenal tumour – n = 1, overt ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome due to: macronodular adrenal hyperplasia associated with primary hyperparathyroidism – n = 1; due to adrenal carcinoma – n = 1; due to adrenal adenomas – n = 2; Cushing’s disease – n = 1). Pheochromocytomas were diagnosed in 3 patients (3.75%). Conclusion: Primary hyperaldosteronism was the most frequent cause of secondary endocrine hypertension in our series, followed by Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytomas. Screening of young hypertensive patients for secondary causes, especially primary hyperaldosteronism, is mandatory.

Keywords: secondary hypertension, primary hyperaldosteronism, hypercortisolism, pheochromocytoma, screening

Full text | PDF

Vitamin D Deficiency in Postmenopausal Women – Biological Correlates

SELECT ISSUE

MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine | Vol. 9, nr. 4, 2014

CNCSIS - CMR - B+ OBBCSSR

Vitamin D Deficiency in Postmenopausal Women – Biological Correlates

Cristina CAPATINA, Mara CARSOTE, Andra CARAGHEORGHEOPOL, Catalina POIANA and Mihai BERTEANU

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Low vitamin D (VD) is associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism and both contribute to deleterious consequences (reduced bone mineral density (BMD), risk of fractures and falls).

Objective: To study the VD status and biological correlates in a group of postmenopausal women.

Material and methods: We studied 123 postmenopausal women evaluated in the C.I.Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, the Pituitary and Neuroendocrine Diseases department. All cases had been reffered for the evaluation of BMD by the general practitioner. The evaluation included serum measurements of total and ionised calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 25 hydroxi vitaminD (25OHD), parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin, betacrosslaps. Central DXA osteodensitometry was performed.

Results: 91.9% of cases had 25OHD serum levels below 30 ng/ml (74.8% had VD deficiency, 17.1% VD insufficiency). Only 8.1% had sufficient VD levels. A history of fragility fractures was present in 45.83% of the osteoporotic patients, 27.27% of the osteopenic ones and 15.15% of the women with normal BMD.

32 women (26%) were on VD supplementation at the time of evaluation. Among these subjects, the 25OHD level was significantly higher in those with prior fragility fractures (p=0.018) and osteoporosis (p=0.008).

25OHD concentration negatively correlated with PTH, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin. The bone markers evaluated had a significant inverse correlation with the radius BMD, T and Z scores (p=0.004).

27.17% of the cases with VD deficiency had secondary hyperparathyroidism. The 25OHD concentration was significantly lower in these cases (p=0.000).

Conclusions: VD insufficiency is widely prevalent but still under-recognized and under-treated, possibly leading to secondary hyperparathyroidism. The compliance to VD supplementation is lower in subjects without osteoporosis or fragility fractures. Primary prevention measures should be more actively implemented.

Full text | PDF



plic-mail[email protected]

 Terms and conditions

© MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine - All rights reserved