MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine Logo
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Standards
    • Types of articles
    • Instructions for authors
    • Editing rules (peer-review protocol)
    • Official Journal’s protocols
  • Editorial Council
  • Peer-review TEAM
  • How to
  • Menu

Author archives

  • About
  • Latest Posts

Aws DAWOOD

Latest posts by Aws DAWOOD (see all)

  • Outcome and Predictors of Stent Thrombosis in the First Romanian Registry of Drug Eluting Stent (RODESINO EXTENSION) - July 3, 2015

Articles signed on MÆDICA, JCM:

Outcome and Predictors of Stent Thrombosis in the First Romanian Registry of Drug Eluting Stent (RODESINO EXTENSION)

SELECT ISSUE

MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine | Vol. 8 (11), no. 2 2013

CNCSIS - CMR - B+ OBBCSSR

HIGHLIGHTS

What is plagiarism

Plagiarism’s meaning comes from the Latin word ‘plagiarius,’ which means to kidnap. When someone uses the work of another writer or artist without properly citing the source or giving credit, that’s plagiarism. [...]

Committe on Publication Ethics

A forum for responsible and ethical research publishing – Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Members Area


Outcome and Predictors of Stent Thrombosis in the First Romanian Registry of Drug Eluting Stent (RODESINO EXTENSION)

Claudiu STOICESCU, Vlad VINTILA, Cristian UDROIU, Nicolae FLORESCU, Aws DAWOOD, Mircea CINTEZA and Dragos VINEREANU

ABSTRACT

Background: Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare, but extremely severe complication of PCI. Outside clinical trials, data are limited regarding the risks and the impact of this phenomenon.

Aims: To assess prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcome of ST after implantation of drug eluting stents (DES) compared with bare metal stents (BMS), in a large case-control study in a real world scenario, as well as the relation between ST and duration of combined antiplatelet treatment.

Methods: In a case-control registry we included 475 patients who received at least 1 DES (sirolimus, zotarolimus, everolimus, paclitaxel), compared with a group of 475 patients who received at least 1 BMS. We used 1.22 DES/patient vs. 1.26 BMS/patient (p=ns), treating 1.02 DES/lesion vs. 1.05 BMS/ lesion (p=ns). Main outcome was ST defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) as definite (acute, sub-acute, late), probable, and possible.

Results: At 15 months we found 0.8% (4) patients in the DES group vs. 1.1% (5) patients in the BMS group with definite ST (ns); 0.4% (2) patients from each group had acute ST, while 0.4% (2) vs. 0.7% (3) patients had sub-acute ST (both comparisons were ns). None of the patients from the DES group died, whereas two patients with definite ST from the BMS group died, with a case fatality rate of 40% (2/5). 0.2% (1) patient from each group had probable ST (ns) and 0.6% (3) vs. 0.4% (2) patients had possible ST (ns). Independent predictors of stent thrombosis in merged groups were antiplatelet therapy discontinuation (HR 3.8; 95%CI 1.9-7.6; p<0.01), diabetes (HR 2.15; 95%CI 1.4-5.1; p<0.01), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (HR 1.1; 95%CI 1.0-1.9; p<0.01 for each 10% decrease), and LAD lesions (HR 1.0; 95%CI, 0.93-1.9; P<0.01).

Conclusions: ST is a rare complication (0.95%), similar after DES or BMS implantation. Premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy, followed by diabetes and a lower LVEF, are the independent predictors of ST.

Full text | PDF



plic-mail[email protected]

 Terms and conditions

© MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine - All rights reserved