MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine Logo
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Standards
    • Types of articles
    • Instructions for authors
    • Editing rules (peer-review protocol)
    • Official Journal’s protocols
  • Editorial Council
  • Peer-review TEAM
  • How to
  • Menu

Author archives

  • About
  • Latest Posts

Oana-Florentina TAUTU

Latest posts by Oana-Florentina TAUTU (see all)

  • New Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Their Use for an Accurate Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Hypertensive Patients - June 19, 2015

Articles signed on MÆDICA, JCM:

New Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Their Use for an Accurate Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Hypertensive Patients

SELECT ISSUE

MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine | Vol. 9, nr. 2, 2014

CNCSIS - CMR - B+ OBBCSSR

New Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Their Use for an Accurate Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Hypertensive Patients

Oana-Florentina TAUTU, Roxana DARABONT, Sebastian ONCIUL, Alexandru DEACONU, Ioana COMANESCU, Radu Dan ANDREI, Bogdan DRAGOESCU, Mircea CINTEZA and Maria DOROBANTU

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To analyze the predictive value of new cardiovascular (CV) risk factors for CV risk assessment in the adult Romanian hypertensive (HT) population.

Methods: Hypertensive adults aged between 40-65 years of age, identified in national representative SEPHAR II survey were evaluated by anthropometric, BP and arterial stiffness measurements: aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVao), aortic augmentation index (AIXao), revers time (RT) and central systolic blood pressure (SBPao), 12 lead ECGs and laboratory workup. Values above the 4th quartile of mean SBP’ standard deviation (s.d.) defined increased BP variability. Log(TG/HDL-cholesterol) defined atherogenic index of plasma (AIP). Serum uric acid levels above 5.70 mg/dl for women and 7.0 mg/dl for males defined hyperuricemia (HUA). CV risk was assessed based on SCORE chart for high CV risk countries. Binary logistic regression using a stepwise likelihood ratio method (adjustments for major confounders and colliniarity analysis) was used in order to validate predictors of high and very high CV risk class.

Results: The mean SBP value of the study group was 148.46±19.61 mmHg. Over forty percent of hypertensives had a high and very high CV risk. Predictors of high/very high CV risk category validated by regression analysis were: increased visit-to-visit BP variability (OR: 2.49; 95%CI: 1.67-3.73), PWVao (OR: 1.12; 95%CI: 1.02-1.22), RT (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98), SBPao (OR: 1.01; 95%CI: 1.01-1.03) and AIP (OR: 7.08; 95%CI: 3.91-12.82).

Conclusion: The results of our study suggests that the new CV risk factors such as increased BP variability, arterial stiffness indices and AIP are useful tools for a more accurate identification of hypertensives patients at high and very high CV risk.

Full text | PDF



plic-mail[email protected]

 Terms and conditions

© MÆDICA - a Journal of Clinical Medicine - All rights reserved